You're advocating no true scottsman fallacy. If anything is stupid in this conversation, it's that. There is no perfectly true Islam.
If you have no opinion on the ethical argument of liberal forms of Islam but are speaking only about theological definitions, fine.
-
-
I had the impression that you were telling Maajid that his liberal version cld not exist in reality rather than in theological definition.
-
But, if you were actually making a theological argument that only true version of Islam exists & can't be revised by today's Muslims, OK.
-
No point arguing with people who believe in one true version of anything that was man-made in the first place.
-
Of course there is. All religions are man-made and have real-world consequences. To say these shouldnt be addressed is shameful on your part
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.