Many version just expose the contradictions. Again, you think not being a Muslim means you're still a Muslim. All kinds of stupid.
I've grasped that there is a semantic argument to be made. I'm suggesting its less important than the reality of versions of Islam.
-
-
If you have no opinion on the ethical argument of liberal forms of Islam but are speaking only about theological definitions, fine.
-
I had the impression that you were telling Maajid that his liberal version cld not exist in reality rather than in theological definition.
-
But, if you were actually making a theological argument that only true version of Islam exists & can't be revised by today's Muslims, OK.
-
No point arguing with people who believe in one true version of anything that was man-made in the first place.
-
Of course there is. All religions are man-made and have real-world consequences. To say these shouldnt be addressed is shameful on your part
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not a semantic argument. Is it still a car with everything removed but the seats? If you think the answer is yes then you're delusional
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.