We both know this is bullshit. If you believe in and adhere to the doctrines then they are timeless and infallible. Herein lies the problem
Which is your right but it doesn't outweigh the evidence that there are many versions & it keeps changing.Neither does saying it's pointless
-
-
Many version just expose the contradictions. Again, you think not being a Muslim means you're still a Muslim. All kinds of stupid.
-
You're advocating no true scottsman fallacy. If anything is stupid in this conversation, it's that. There is no perfectly true Islam.
-
If I put a sofa into a woodchipper until it's just millions of fibres, would that still be a sofa? It's not the NTS fallacy when it's true.
-
Islam isn't a sofa. It's a vast set of ideas and the word "Muslim" describes anyone who believes some set of them and self describes as one.
-
Also I don't care if you call liberal versions of Islam 'Islam' or not. The point is that reformers try to draw Muslims to it & that's good.
-
Theological, philosophical or semantic arguments abt what constitutes true Islam are academic at best for Non-Muslims.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Please try to remain civil.. Of course non-Muslims can have theological/philosophical/semantic arguments abt the definition of Islam.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Muslims forever calling each other 'not real Muslims' for having a different version. You can do it too, if you like, but not really point
-
I'm not trying to define one, true Islam coz I don't think there is one. I just like Ahmadis better than Salafists & reformers better still
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.