The null hypothesis is false. It could be true but we can't believe everything that can't be disproven. Teapot. Invisible pink unicorns.
-
-
Replying to @Contragamer911
I don't know what you mean. Religious ppl accept science too. Some atheists don't. Science isn't religion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Contragamer911
This is where we started. I answered this. We don't share beliefs. We may or may not conform to things or be committed to causes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Contragamer911
Let's respect each other's right to have opinions but reserve respect for opinions we think are right. We haven't insulted each other.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Contragamer911
It's a well-known logical argument about burden of proof & why it has to work the way it does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Contragamer911
I think you'd have considered any analogy potentially insulting but it's hard to make the point without one.
9:44 PM - 6 Apr 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.