I'm not suggesting we do. Your God could reveal itself whenever it likes. Just saying if there is no God, we can't know this.
It's a famous analogy used to show burden of proof being on person making truth claim. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot … Offence isn't relevant.
-
-
The null hypothesis is false. It could be true but we can't believe everything that can't be disproven. Teapot. Invisible pink unicorns.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I don't know what you mean. Religious ppl accept science too. Some atheists don't. Science isn't religion.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This is where we started. I answered this. We don't share beliefs. We may or may not conform to things or be committed to causes.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Let's respect each other's right to have opinions but reserve respect for opinions we think are right. We haven't insulted each other.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.