-
-
Replying to @MaajidNawaz
We both know this is bullshit. If you believe in and adhere to the doctrines then they are timeless and infallible. Herein lies the problem
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PolemicCont @MaajidNawaz
They're not tho. All liberal Muslims adapt doctrines. Reformers are the ones who are open that they're doing that.pic.twitter.com/H0EuCmVoBt
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
'Liberal muslim' = Someone who doesn't take their religion seriously.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PolemicCont @MaajidNawaz
Nah. Theological history is essentially an account of ppl adapting their religion & taking it very seriously indeed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
Okay, so if all Muslims decided that Allah is no longer god and Mohammad wasn't the prophet, that would still be Islam? Give it a rest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PolemicCont @MaajidNawaz
Well, yeah. Seeing as how they decided what Islam was in the first place. Or do you think its divine revelation?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MaajidNawaz
It would no longer be a Islam, it would be something else. That's like saying a cow is now a pigeon just because some people now decide it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PolemicCont
Except that cows & pigeons actually exist & Islam is a man-made story? The latter can evolve out of all recognition much faster by consensus
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But this was not the point. The point was that moral values change. Compare Ahmadis to Sufis to Salafists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.