Well, yeah. Seeing as how they decided what Islam was in the first place. Or do you think its divine revelation?
-
-
It would no longer be a Islam, it would be something else. That's like saying a cow is now a pigeon just because some people now decide it
-
Except that cows & pigeons actually exist & Islam is a man-made story? The latter can evolve out of all recognition much faster by consensus
-
Islam does exist, so a moot point. You're basically saying you can be a Muslim no matter what you believe, making 'Muslim' utter pointless
-
It exists as a story with many versions & changes. You seem to think of it as one pure, unchanging thing rather than something ppl make up
-
Which is your right but it doesn't outweigh the evidence that there are many versions & it keeps changing.Neither does saying it's pointless
-
Many version just expose the contradictions. Again, you think not being a Muslim means you're still a Muslim. All kinds of stupid.
-
You're advocating no true scottsman fallacy. If anything is stupid in this conversation, it's that. There is no perfectly true Islam.
-
If I put a sofa into a woodchipper until it's just millions of fibres, would that still be a sofa? It's not the NTS fallacy when it's true.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
However,that's not what's happening & its not likely to. Key figures usually remain but moral interpretations change in sync with culture.
-
Although Yahweh did lose his wife a few thousand years ago. Uncommon tho.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.