ok so i read this article on the dangers of postmodernism (https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/ …) i disagree with a lot of it, but it’s not a bad article
What kind of questions? Are we talking about anatomy & physiology or attitude towards disability.
-
-
If "normal" or "abled" is understood as a social construct, you can ask what effects it has. E.g. pressure to present as abled.
-
…Instead of accepting it as a given, unquestionable, universal reference point.
-
People must have the right not accept treatment which could bring them closer to that point, of course. But also to be offered it.
-
I think we're having a hard time talking about this because we're using different mental models.
-
Probably. I'm mostly interested in equality, rights & freedom but this includes the freedom to think abt ableism as you see fit.
-
Ok. So if I think that ableism is a kind of oppression that ought to be reduced, that's also cool with you?
-
And if the underlying theory that motivates certain suggestions has postmodern qualities, that's also fine?
-
It depends what they are. If they are compatible with human rights, equality & freedom, its those which should be legislated.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.