Yes, there are truths to call on to form moral evaluations but they themselves are then subjective.
If we have a different premise which involves a god existing & sending ppl to heaven or hell, maximising wellbeing looks very different.
-
-
It may then be necessary to torture, maim, kill certain ppl to get maximum number to obey & get to heaven & avoid eternal torture.
-
yes, if granted the premise of heaven & hell, but i don't think harris' premise & heaven & hell premise are equally valid...
-
Neither do I but they do exist & so does subjective morality. Harris landscape symbolises the different moral options too. Not like facts.
-
There are many ways to be morally right, only one way to be factually right.
-
perhaps, but couldn't one say that about any complex phenomena, of which morality is just one type...
-
Yes! What does that have to do with there being a difference between facts - right or wrong - and morality - a range of arguments
-
because i think morality is just describing/debating the set of facts regarding conscious (human) well being
-
So do I. I'm a humanist too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.