Doesn't matter how clearly I define what I'm talking about or set out examples, 'But surely that's wrong coz I'm talking abt something else'
-
-
-
I admit defeat. Absolutely hopeless. Waste of time.
-
oh c'mon! that's not the helen i know! the helen i know will burn an incredible amount of time & energy before conceding fruitlessness
-
I'm exhausted by it. Gonna take a break.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not being able to artificially simplify humanity and the world doesn't mean that we are screwed.
-
We dont need to be able to simplify, just communicate rather than flounder & talk past each other.
-
You mean us? Neither of us is floundering. And we both understand each other. I agree with you but I'm looking for a more humanistic stance.
-
You among others. We completely failed to have a conversation coz to you 'truth' & 'reality' encompasses beliefs & facts.
-
Whilst the purpose of my tweets was to distinguish between the two. Nothing humanistic about expanding words to meaninglessness.
-
Or including supernatural and unevidenced claims in 'truth' and 'reality.' https://humanism.org.uk/humanism/how-humanist-are-you/ …
-
I meant humanistic in the wider sense as in humanistic geography.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm such a troll, but I can agree that an objective reality exists.
-
No, because whales aren't even fish.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You've been arguing with post-modernists again, haven't you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i think when people talk about 'their reality' they are essentially describing their own ignorance about the limits of their perception(s)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.