I don't want to keep reading it past the flawed thinking it is producing; the key ideas that continue to circulate & get in the way.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But in order to decide that a philosophical claim is not logical, don't you have to (on some level) actually do philosophy?
-
You have to evaluate it & see if to works & pinpoint why it doesn't. On that level, yes.
-
Then as long as ppl are making those claims, that error, it can be addressed w/out further reading of philosophy/theology
-
I don't care how a later work comes away from the Nietzschean influence & leans more towards Heidegger.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.