The problem with writing about postmodernism is that then people want to discuss the fine points of postmodern theory with you.
-
-
You can get just as endlessly bogged down arguing abt the logical implications of Foucault's words as you can Muhammad's.
-
Many philosophers enjoy trying to cut through this & clarify (others enjoy obscuring it further but ignore them). I'm not a philosopher
-
I'm much more interested in how they boil down to ideas, principles & values that affect society. (I'm aware this is a bit Foucauldian!)
-
The difference is that I don't think knowledge itself is contingent or relative. We just have variable barriers to getting at it.
-
-
In its defence, though, to most people in most situations, this will be indistinguishable from "relative truth".
-
@BaileyNagy But that's the fallacy he's addressing. Ppl thinking that disagreement = no one truth rather than some people being wrong. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.