No, I don't. Have addressed ppl critiquing what I said, not ppl critiquing things I didn't or telling me what I shld be talking abt insteadhttps://twitter.com/marcos_gun/status/846697096296194050 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, you do. Saying a hypothesis is wrong isn't telling someone what to talk about. It's telling them they're wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcos_gun
You said I didnt address American conservatives enough in essay abt French pomos coz only one para on them being another factor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No, that's not what I said. I pointed out that it militates against your thesis pomo is the cause of receptivity to relativism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcos_gun
Which I say myself in the piece. Its not the only cause. Conservatives have a long history of this themselves.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, and for much longer! So it's odd to say A causes B because it precedes it, but not C, which precedes both.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcos_gun
But I'm not saying this, am I?! It feels as tho you want me to be coz so easy to shoot down. In fact, I say this:pic.twitter.com/mFV5IhmEZ8
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I was talking about the cultural receptivity thesis, not the account of the history of identity politics on the right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And I mentioned both. And have now posted pics. Please can we stop arguing abt claims I am not making now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.