My issue is with the paper putting "Hijabi & Victim" together. And people following up. Was that necessary? @HPluckrose @SaritaAgermanhttps://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/844991709763260417 …
-
-
Replying to @KMKUGULET @SaritaAgerman
Hijabis can also be victims of terrorist attacks. Yes, I think it was as she's been presented as somehow complicit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Agreed. Hijabis can & have been victims of terrorist attacks.
@HPluckrose@SaritaAgerman Not this one. Being presented as complicit is wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KMKUGULET @SaritaAgerman
OK, well I don't understand why you feel so sure she wasn't on the bridge at the time. Seems likely she was.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SaritaAgerman
And even if she wasn't in direct danger herself, still fairly traumatic walking into that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Simple question. How many victims were there in that attack? What will the official records show?
@HPluckrose@SaritaAgerman1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KMKUGULET @SaritaAgerman
They'll speak of the injured people. I'll consider people who were endangered & surrounded by gore also victims.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But I have to go so I'll leave it here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.