I said what the problem is in the essay. Can I suggest you read it?
-
-
No, it doesn't. I'd love it if it did and that;s what I advocate in my conclusion, but it doesn't in practice.
-
Crenshaw rejects 'I am a person who happens to be black' purely because of its universality. That's a shame.
-
We need specialist attention to ways in which groups are marginalised but not at cost of humanity & individuality
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I argue the same thing. We exist on many levels. Universal liberalism did neglect group identity. 1/2
-
But intersectionality by focusing solely on group identity neglects all other dimensions. Even more limited.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There really isn't any reason to limit your inclusiveness to one ideology & one aspect of a person.
-
I do not find my experience limited to 'woman' 'white' 'middle class' 'disabled' 'bisexual'. I'm more than this.
-
Very little of what is me is dependent on those things. History, ethics, psychology transcend such pettiness.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.