Nobody said that they were. I'm wondering were you get this idea. I haven't seen anybody argue this.
Its about government not being allowed to interfere with free speech, isn't it? Murray & protesters not gov
-
-
yes, in most cases the U.S. govt can't interfere with free speech.
-
How were the government involved in this case? What makes 1st amendment relevant?
-
the govt wasn't involved but the discussion is about free speech, has to be interpreted thru lens of 1st amend.
-
Even tho it doesn't cover the actions of private individuals & this was private individuals? No.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think that was what you were asking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.