the gist of it was when Stephen disagreed that Rubin was even providing a biased platform for the alt right, which he is.
It does seem to be 'This person is wrong to defend someone who spoke to someone I don't like in a way I don't like.'
-
-
I might well agree with you abt Rubin but if someone else doesn't, he doesn't. He cld be wrong but its not a respect breaker.
-
that for me depends on how much they know and what it is. For example, Hitler apologists are right out.
-
and ignorance is only an excuse for so long, and only until people present the facts
-
and it's not like I'm saying people can't be forgiven either. All I'm saying is if I think someone is wrong, I'll say so.
-
OK, me too. I'll say 'I think you're wrong about that.'
-
yeah, all I'm saying is that Stephen was wrong to defend Rubin, I'm not trying to assassinate his character
-
OK but I'd go with mistaken wrong rather than morally wrong unless he has the same assessement of him as you do & thinks its great
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
and it's not like it's just the interviews. He says plenty of things himself. He's a trump apologist who attacks "regressives"
-
I'm going to leave it here & watch a film with my girls. I'll watch him one day & see what I agree with & what I don't.
-
ok good, thanks for helping me clarify my argument
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.