if you're talking about @GSpellchecker defending @RubinReport , he is clearly not paying attention to what Rubin is doing.
-
-
I wasn't but that is an example. I don't care what anyone thinks of Rubin. I don't know him well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the least you can do is listen to what people say. He invites RWNJ on his show, no challenging ideas
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT @HPluckrose and
then he calls them the "new center" and "allies." Again, disagreement is possible w/o vilification
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Absolutely. I don't have to get involved though, do I? I prefer different podcasts
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
of course, you pick your own friends, and your own battles. Different people have diff standards
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
I don't require ppl to meet mine. I don't consider myself a member of any group so I don't have to monitor values of other members
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @DerekGT
I mostly engage when people have ideas I think particularly good or particularly bad & I think I have something worthwhile to say
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
ok, I happen to think it's a bad idea to defend someone who provides a megaphone for RWNJ fools.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DerekGT
Defend them in what way tho? Take what they're defending and argue with that. Fed up with 'You defend 'A' & he's bad'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know Rubin but I'd defend his right to have the guests he wants & interview them in the way he likes. Ppl can watch or not.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.