We're now seeing: "You're a bad person coz you like someone who defended someone who shared a platform with someone who's a bad person!"
Absolutely. I don't have to get involved though, do I? I prefer different podcasts
-
-
of course, you pick your own friends, and your own battles. Different people have diff standards
-
I don't require ppl to meet mine. I don't consider myself a member of any group so I don't have to monitor values of other members
-
I mostly engage when people have ideas I think particularly good or particularly bad & I think I have something worthwhile to say
-
ok, I happen to think it's a bad idea to defend someone who provides a megaphone for RWNJ fools.
-
Defend them in what way tho? Take what they're defending and argue with that. Fed up with 'You defend 'A' & he's bad'
-
I don't know Rubin but I'd defend his right to have the guests he wants & interview them in the way he likes. Ppl can watch or not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.