This poll is useless for actually establishing majority views but it is quite interesting for other reasons.https://twitter.com/EveKeneinan/status/837594847708131328 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Obviously non-believers would rather get rid of cancer than non-belief but I suspect many religious ppl would also eradicate cancer.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Because of a respect for the right of other views to exist &a wish to end one form of suffering in this world. I wld not have voted this way
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
When I believed in a literal hell for non-believers, I wld have rationalised that this is way worse than cancer which is temporary suffering
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Ppl arguing underneath that religious ppl who'd eradicate atheism wld rather let thousands die than be disagreed with aren't seeing this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The problem with religion is not primarily authoritarianism & demands for conformity but a fatally skewed compassion due to false beliefs.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Which leads to authoritarianism & demands for conformity, obviously. But not always. The not always ppl are interesting.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
They either don't believe in Hell, don't believe non-believers go there or don't believe eternal torture is worse than cancer & eternal life
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Or they want non-believers to suffer horribly for all eternity, obviously. But most believers are not sadistic psychopaths.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.