Here's a section of an academic piece of mine on it. Have several more accessible ones published. http://helenpluckroseblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/extract-from-essay-of-mine-which-breaks.html …
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Okay, clearly you understand intersectionality (even if you don't agree w/ intersectional feminism). I apologize.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames @HPluckrose
But your use of "intersectionals" in this convo is a red flag, imo, in context of you pushing back against diversity &inclusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames
Absolutely not. My argument is for diversity & inclusion. My problem is with interesectional, identity politics approaches to this
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kejames
We saw with the march for women that women who are pro-life or gender critical were told they were not welcome by organisers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kejames
I'm critical of both those positions but they're still women with genuine interest in March.WoC more likely to take these positions
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kejames
Because more likely to be religious. Then white women told they don't get to come unless they explicitly check their privilege.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kejames
And it began to turn into a March for intersectionals hostile to the values of most women. Fortunately, most women ignored this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @kejames
I expect the same will happen here & those who love science will come regardless of ideology of organisers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But wouldn't it be nice to be inclusive in the first place?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.