6/ The other is that @ScienceMarchDC has made some serious mistakes in its diversity and inclusion efforts. I believe these can be fixed.
-
-
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
Good. Take note of the fact that not all scientists are intersectionals. Diversity of ideas too, please.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScienceMarchDC
You seem to be suggesting that diversity & inclusion efforts put scientists who are not "intersectionals" (?) 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
2/ and "diversity of ideas" at a disadvantage. How so?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
If you want the march to be about diversity of identity in science, that's one thing but then its not about science
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The scientists I have seen arguing about this are all for equality & equal opportunity but not intersectionality.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScienceMarchDC
I'm not sure you are understanding the term "intersectionality" correctly. Try google?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames
Here's a section of an academic piece of mine on it. Have several more accessible ones published. http://helenpluckroseblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/extract-from-essay-of-mine-which-breaks.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Okay, clearly you understand intersectionality (even if you don't agree w/ intersectional feminism). I apologize.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Thank you. I have deleted my sigh! Indeed, I am one of many committed to equality & concerned abt the intersectional approach to it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.