5/ So we have 2 problems here. One is people attacking @ScienceMarchDC for including social justice in its platform &planning. #ScienceMarch
-
-
Replying to @kejames
6/ The other is that
@ScienceMarchDC has made some serious mistakes in its diversity and inclusion efforts. I believe these can be fixed.3 replies 8 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
Good. Take note of the fact that not all scientists are intersectionals. Diversity of ideas too, please.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScienceMarchDC
You seem to be suggesting that diversity & inclusion efforts put scientists who are not "intersectionals" (?) 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
2/ and "diversity of ideas" at a disadvantage. How so?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
If you want the march to be about diversity of identity in science, that's one thing but then its not about science
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScienceMarchDC
That is a straw man. No one is proposing to make the march "about diversity", but to include 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
2/ (or better, integrate) it in issues & planning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
You're simply talking about including ppl from diverse backgrounds? Absolutely! Is anyone saying to exclude them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is that 'No, I'm not simply talking abt including ppl from diverse backgrounds' or 'no, no-one is trying to exclude them' ?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.