This is not hard. To harm or hinder scientists is to harm or hinder science. Social justice MUST be part of science advocacy. #ScienceMarch
-
-
That is a straw man. No one is proposing to make the march "about diversity", but to include 1/
-
2/ (or better, integrate) it in issues & planning.
-
You're simply talking about including ppl from diverse backgrounds? Absolutely! Is anyone saying to exclude them?
-
No. please google.
-
Is that 'No, I'm not simply talking abt including ppl from diverse backgrounds' or 'no, no-one is trying to exclude them' ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The scientists I have seen arguing about this are all for equality & equal opportunity but not intersectionality.
-
I'm not sure you are understanding the term "intersectionality" correctly. Try google?
-
Here's a section of an academic piece of mine on it. Have several more accessible ones published. http://helenpluckroseblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/extract-from-essay-of-mine-which-breaks.html …
-
Okay, clearly you understand intersectionality (even if you don't agree w/ intersectional feminism). I apologize.
-
But your use of "intersectionals" in this convo is a red flag, imo, in context of you pushing back against diversity &inclusion.
-
Absolutely not. My argument is for diversity & inclusion. My problem is with interesectional, identity politics approaches to this
-
We saw with the march for women that women who are pro-life or gender critical were told they were not welcome by organisers.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.