This is not hard. To harm or hinder scientists is to harm or hinder science. Social justice MUST be part of science advocacy. #ScienceMarch
-
-
Replying to @kejames
2/ Fighting social injustice, e.g. through diversity & inclusion efforts, is an essential part of advocating for science.
#ScienceMarch1 reply 20 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @kejames
3/ …as essential as fighting science funding cuts, muzzling of scientists, manipulating science, & twisting/ignoring research conclusions.
1 reply 14 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @kejames
4/ So it is reasonable to expect
@ScienceMarchDC to include this as part of its platform and to address it in planning the#ScienceMarch.2 replies 9 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @kejames
5/ So we have 2 problems here. One is people attacking
@ScienceMarchDC for including social justice in its platform &planning.#ScienceMarch1 reply 8 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @kejames
6/ The other is that
@ScienceMarchDC has made some serious mistakes in its diversity and inclusion efforts. I believe these can be fixed.3 replies 8 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @kejames @ScienceMarchDC
Good. Take note of the fact that not all scientists are intersectionals. Diversity of ideas too, please.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ScienceMarchDC
You seem to be suggesting that diversity & inclusion efforts put scientists who are not "intersectionals" (?) 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Making a march abt intersectional ideology is biased, yes. We'd all see the problem if it abt conservative values
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.