(of course) but I find her arguments disingenious. She's is pretending to fight "choice feminism" (as do intersectionals) ->
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
but is actually fighting against intersectional feminists by falsely painting them as "choice feminists"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
She cleverly ignores that she has the entire academia and feminists orgs on side in this issue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
Not as a Radfem, no. They'd call her a white feminist.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes indeed but they agree with her regarding "choice feminism". They disagree on many other things, of course.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
I'm not sure they do. That would be ppl like Valenti &
@Sarkeesian also placed very much in the white feminist camp by intersec1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Sarkeesian
really? They both consider themselves intersectionals and cite Bell Hooks continuously.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
Loads of enmity aimed at them by intersectionals who say they pay lip-service service only & appropriate WoC like hooks.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wow! I admit that I haven't been keeping track. If even Valenti and Anita are now failing the ideological purity test...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen
I give some examples here. See Intersectional feminism section and white feminism section.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I didn't actually link it? http://helenpluckroseblogs.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/a-twitter-users-guide-to-different.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.