really? They both consider themselves intersectionals and cite Bell Hooks continuously.
-
-
Replying to @BristolBen
Loads of enmity aimed at them by intersectionals who say they pay lip-service service only & appropriate WoC like hooks.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wow! I admit that I haven't been keeping track. If even Valenti and Anita are now failing the ideological purity test...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen
They actually come from different places. V & S are universalists from a Marxist viewpoint, seeing women as a class. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
And then they add some intersectionality to further refine ways in which women experience oppression. 2/3
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
Intersectionals who actually have this as their primary framework - Crenshawe, Lourde, critical race theory -reject this harshly
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
To them, gender is just one marginalised identity & one of the least important ones - race & trans first - so V & S = White fems
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
So you're saying that the victim groups feminism co-opted to perpetuate itself are now rejecting the feminism?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @BristolBen
I need to write something abt this coz its not really that complicated but a bit beyond tweeting.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The different schools of thought feminism & intersectionality came from. Marxism vs political postmodernism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
We have an amalgamation - intersectional feminism - but it's never really been combined. One is foregrounded hugely.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.