Reading that article, the author appears to be a standard 2nd wave radical. She doesn't have to call herself a feminist ->
-
-
libfems will oppose it on the grounds of undermining the cause of women who must present a united ideological front.
-
Agreed. That is why I find this article disingenuous. Nobody is arguing for choice feminism. It's a strawwoman!
-
XD They're all opposing what cld be called 'feminism-lite' where ppl like the general empowering idea but no fixed ideology,
-
That's why celebrities get it a lot. They're not committed enough to ideology & often don't even know it - just pro-women.
-
And you & I have no ideology, no theory, just a commitment to gender equality, universal human rights & individual freedom.
-
Which makes us old-school liberals and not feminists & shows why we were right to drop the label.
-
Amen. We held on for a long time but I just became untenable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.