Gains for women were not made made by a few radical women being shocking. They were made by widescale social change including both sexes.https://twitter.com/guardianbooks/status/837471606641315840 …
-
-
what *smaller* battles would you say still need to fought (not related to Islam/multiculturalism)?
-
Social expectations of men & women but I'm not sure they need to be fought so much as confidently defied.
-
are there any policy related issues though? Also who would u say face bigger/more battles related to their gender: women or men?
-
Not very many & they tend to work both ways. Eg maternity leave vs paternity leave. Both sexes claim discrimination.
-
Legally, I think only other diff is MGM remaining legal whilst FGM is not. But FGM not prosecuted here & much more damaging
-
There is no law stating that men should get longer sentences than women for same crimes but they do anyway.
-
cool. Thanks for answering my questions. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Reading that article, the author appears to be a standard 2nd wave radical. She doesn't have to call herself a feminist ->
-
(of course) but I find her arguments disingenious. She's is pretending to fight "choice feminism" (as do intersectionals) ->
-
but is actually fighting against intersectional feminists by falsely painting them as "choice feminists"
-
Yes, she's a Radfem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And as many generals would say, there is no force more poisonous than a great host that's gone stagnant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.