Takes apart example of conflicting reviews of a speaker - disagreement on whether he was witty used to argue different realities exist.
-
-
-
Points out that in fact the reviewers agreed on nearly everything abt the speaker - he was not an iguana, he was less than 10 feet tall etc.
-
None of them mentioned that he was a human with standard physiology because they didn't need to. Because reality exists & we all know it.
-
He points out that its when things are contentious that we feel the need to talk abt them, but nearly everything isn't, so we don't.
-
This seems relevant to accusations like 'You spend more time saying punching Nazis is bad than saying Nazis are bad so you're pro-Nazi.'
-
In reality, ppl may not feel the need to say Nazism is bad coz consensus on this with very few outliers. Punching them on other hand...
-
Strongly recommend Challenging Postmodernism for accessible & rigorous philosophical breakdown of pomo on its own terms written beautifully.
-
Phrenology, Communism, Homeopathy, Postmodernism, Critical Race Theory. Hi, and welcome to the historical dustbin of bad ideas.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sherlockmichael reality is reality but people may have a subjective understanding of it. Only what we either no or don't yet? -
Yes. Science tries to get as close to objective reality as possible. Pomo tries to show it doesn't exist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
huh? I'm watching "Money for Nothing" An existential treatise on a woman's attempt to repurpose dumped stuff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
facts are facts, but it's the understanding we approach them with that makes it all subjective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.