No. The difference is a recognition that these parents are not malicious & actually want to secure the best future for their children. https://twitter.com/hws5mp/status/836557789505912832 …
.@FergusMason1 Its not done due to a desire to hurt or maim a child because you enjoy their suffering & hate them.pic.twitter.com/o66fGUCzFu
-
-
.
@FergusMason1 Same principle as when JW parents deny blood transfusions or other Xtian grps medication to their kids.Not coz they hate them -
.
@FergusMason1 They think they're doing the right thing for their child by pleasing God. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The consequences are no different. The motivations are relevant tho. Tells us whether child otherwise safe.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This is now a different subject. Parents mutilating kids & a society which oppresses women.
-
Male genital mutilation is still regarded as morally OK in the west. Cutting baby boys penises for sexual pleasure is not.
-
Education is needed because we know parents do not consider themselves to be abusing their sons. Law changes too, obv.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That does not make it less barbaric a practice
-
No. Not at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.