Now been told that if the US constitution privileges religious freedom over non-religious freedom, this isn't a privilege but a right.
-
-
It is essentially an argument from authority & tradition much more associated with conservatism ( if you listen to Jonathan Haidt.)
-
You could argue this is why our constitution works. It's very malliable, and no one really understands it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Partly this isn't specifically about the contitution, it's just generic US attitude to everything: WORLD = US + everything else
-
But even if US was the world, wouldn't mean one text written centuries ago gets everything right & needs no expansion/adaptation.
-
Indeed. As I said before, the Constitution framers USED the concept of free speech: they didn't INVENT or DEFINE it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.