"It's constitutional/unconstitutional' is not necessarily same as 'It's ethical/unethical.' It cld be. Often is. But you have to argue that.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
almost as if nothing should be "set in stone" & always needs to be argued for *cough* ;-)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @j_razor101
They can be both. I'm committed to liberalism but I'll never stop arguing for the best way to achieve equal rights & freedoms.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't believe in anything apart from that which I think is defendable. Often makes me a liberal, sometimes not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_razor101
I think we all feel that way. I tend to find I can only defend things which benefit human rights & freedom.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
but even that is subjective. It all get messy very quickly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_razor101
Humanity is messy. Got to keep trying to work thru it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
indeed. It's ultimately a battle of ideas. What does a "good" outcome mean & can I persuade others I'm right. Etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_razor101
Or find out that I'm not & fix that. I'd be surprised if your aims were ever anything I'd consider illiberal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
me too &a vice-versa. But I know there are many who would. Battle of ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Because we're not talking abt the same things
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.