This is why there should only be rules that can be justified very convincingly. No covering ears in exams for example. For everyone.https://twitter.com/seeker8002/status/835983038421024769 …
OK but you can't decide for other people what is needless segregation. They can wear what they want unless its dangerous.
-
-
me alone? No. But I can make the argument & seek consensus. Also, it's kids, not adults. Big difference.
-
I'll join a conensus which says covering hair for modesty is bad, for fashion, custom, convenience, tidyness is neutral.
-
won't work. Someone can simply say it's not for modesty. Only the two extremes are realistic here.
-
No, I don't think so. The world will not end if some kids wear scarves for modesty, some for fashion, most don't wear them.
-
of course it won't end. I'm simply saying it's preferable. Segregation in schools doesn't tend to produce good social outcomes.
-
But neither does limiting freedom of religion or expression. Put kids in together, definitely. Don't start banning relig garb.
-
I can see your argument but its veers into authoritarianism. Even tho kids are essentially being controlled by someone anyway.
-
if it does, we already have it. If I worked at the council I don't get to turn up to work in my Prince Sexy MF T-shirt.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
)