This is why there should only be rules that can be justified very convincingly. No covering ears in exams for example. For everyone.https://twitter.com/seeker8002/status/835983038421024769 …
I'd choose freedom as much as possible. Not ban anything unless you really have to.
-
-
broadly I agree. But we agree to curtail freedoms all the time if the argument is sound enough. I think this is one such.
-
I don't. I want anyone who wants to wear a headscarf to do so for any reason, not for it to be limited to religion &/or modesty.
-
Doesn't affect me what other people do with their hair so no grounds to ban. My daughter likes to wear them. Indian, ex-Hindu.
-
ok, small example. I think we're around the same age? Do you remember non-school uniform days. The rich(er) kids would 1/
-
come in decked in the latest expensive stuff. The poor(er) kids obviously not. Bullying, separation, tension quickly happened.
-
Sure but scarves don't cost a lot. Niqabs shouldn't be in schools cos a barrier but putting a scarf on doesn't do that.
-
that's irrelevant. By your logic, allow the scarf, allow anything. Remember only the two extremes are consistent.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
)