I don't agree that strongly held religious values more important than strongly held non-religious.
-
-
because freedom of religion is the cornerstone of our constitution?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Um, that would mean non-relig should be treated the same as relig, and non-relig don't have the option..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm not following you here. How does being denied the right to wear a hat violate atheism?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Illinipoke @Glompzilla
Atheism doesn't have any values. Non-religious ppl might have them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Glompzilla
your completely losing me on your point here.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Illinipoke @Glompzilla
eg vegetarianism. Can be based on religious or secular beliefs. Should be equally valued & catered for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Glompzilla
vegetarianism, smartness, bright jihabs? I'm lost.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Illinipoke @Glompzilla
I'd like strongly held secular values to have the same freedom as strongly held religious ones. And consistency.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Illinipoke
So would I, but they do not, here in the USA, not yet. But relig ones can be used to break barriers too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, I am speaking of what to work for rather than what actually is the norm now. And not just in America.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.