Am for it being allowed for without reason. But better relig except than total ban imo.
-
-
I don't agree that strongly held religious values more important than strongly held non-religious.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
because freedom of religion is the cornerstone of our constitution?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Um, that would mean non-relig should be treated the same as relig, and non-relig don't have the option..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm not following you here. How does being denied the right to wear a hat violate atheism?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Illinipoke @Glompzilla
Atheism doesn't have any values. Non-religious ppl might have them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Glompzilla
your completely losing me on your point here.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Illinipoke @HPluckrose
I see that. If you grant rights based on which religion, that is not equal treatment. permission slip is silly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But imo, it allows the seal to be cracked, so maybe soon we won't care about hats, for any reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Glompzilla @HPluckrose
problem is safety where hats/bananas worn to identify gangs. Prob not an issue at this school but can be at others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And we tend to see religions as different to gangs although in some places same tribal divisions & violence exists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.