how should schools verify that a kid gets to be an exception to the dress code due to their religion?
-
-
because freedom of religion is the cornerstone of our constitution?
-
Does that not include freedom from religion? That the non-religious shld have the same freedoms?
-
no, because there is nothing about "non religion" that requires it's followers to wear a hat.
-
No. But non-religious people have other value systems or individual beliefs.
-
what does that have to do with this? I'm not seeing the lines between your dots.
-
Some value systems & customs are religious, some are secular. We privilege religious ones. This is unethical
-
it's the constitution if the United States. It's what our rules are built around. Not "fairness".
-
Then constitution is unethical if it privileges religious ppl over non-religious.I'm not specific talking abt US tho
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I see your point, but allowing it for one group opens door, Someone has to go first, but valid point yours
-
I'm not following. Where do we differ? I'm saying we shouldn't allow it for one group. No-one has to go first.
-
I get your point, but also posit that when a change is made, often one group goes first, here. then: none, Now: few, soon, all.
-
Historically, yes, but I'd have a big problem with that in this time. Men get to do this first, then women?
-
Your point is logically correct, but.. denying it to some does not advance rights of anyone. All journeys must start with astep
-
Yes, but I'd be very concerned if the step was to give one group in society rights another did not have. Thats a step backwards
-
But step forwards to start allowing freedom, but I see your point, slippery slope, But in the right direction... again, imo.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.