'Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist' is accurate description too. Those feminists do exclude trans women as beneficiaries of their feminism
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
It's no good saying 'But I think I have a good reason for excluding them'. Vegetarians are still vegetarians even if they have good reasons.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Are all trans exclusionary feminists necessarily radfems though?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jsdebeer
There cld well be some feminists who don't accept trans identity but aren't radfems but TERF refers to branch of radfems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Lurked in the GenderCritical subreddit for a while, and while dumb and petty, they didn't strike me as very RadFem-y.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
The notion that only radical change will work. Treating gender as 100% social construct. Tendency towards self-segregation. Etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jsdebeer
They might not be extreme tho. Just a different branch to libfems. Although it sounds contradictory, radfems can be moderate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yup, agreed. Huge Babylonian confusion of tongues with anti-feminists, who do use 'radical' as interchangeable with 'extreme'.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jsdebeer
Oh yes. I go on abt this a lot. I know you're not doing this but I've not come across gender critical feminists on liberal branch
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sometimes moderate radical feminists can be more liberal than intersectional libfems!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.