Make the behaviour illegal. Saying you don't think non-binary gender is real?
Harassing or assaulting non-binary person? 
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, however when the behavior and the expression are indistinguishable, what do you do?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @philogaytheist
I don't know what you mean. If its an idea being expressed, leave it alone. If its an action harming someone, stop it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Social media. The opinion and the behavior are so overlapped now it's skewed the notion of expression in ways that are weird.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @philogaytheist
Still not sure what you mean. Ppl can say what they think on social media. Easy to block them or log out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes. But if people carry the expectations of social media elsewhere. We've got problems. Hence my use of the term skewed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @philogaytheist
I think you'll need to be very specific & perhaps give an example of what you mean before I understand you.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
3)contextual nuances that don't comport to social media. There's less to navigate and less at stake. Good thing is creativity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @philogaytheist
This seems like an argument that communication differs online & in person but not to address the central freedom thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
2) to behavior, then it the central freedom is, at the very least, not exhaustive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nope. Sorry. Not with you at all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.