This is an entirely different thing to harmful actions perpetrated verbally.No continuum re discussing eg libertarianism & eg ordering a hit
I think you'll need to be very specific & perhaps give an example of what you mean before I understand you.
-
-
3)contextual nuances that don't comport to social media. There's less to navigate and less at stake. Good thing is creativity.
-
This seems like an argument that communication differs online & in person but not to address the central freedom thing.
-
1) But if behavior is what needs attention and we need to preserve freedom of expression and online expression is uniquely bound
-
Actions, yes. Are you harming anyone or are you just talking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
2) or block or simply ignore. Outside of social media, that same expression is accompanied by facial expressions, conversation.
-
Yes. I'm still not sure how this relates to or complicates 'Allow all speech. Prosecute harmful actions.'
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
4)downside is divisiveness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1)Example: On Twitter, people are free to express whatever opinion they wish. If it offends someone, that person may interact,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Harassing or assaulting non-binary person? 