I think there's a problem with seeing free speech in terms of a continuum based on *speech* -what speech is allowed & what is not allowed.
I don't know what you mean. If its an idea being expressed, leave it alone. If its an action harming someone, stop it.
-
-
Social media. The opinion and the behavior are so overlapped now it's skewed the notion of expression in ways that are weird.
-
Still not sure what you mean. Ppl can say what they think on social media. Easy to block them or log out.
-
Yes. But if people carry the expectations of social media elsewhere. We've got problems. Hence my use of the term skewed.
-
I think you'll need to be very specific & perhaps give an example of what you mean before I understand you.
-
3)contextual nuances that don't comport to social media. There's less to navigate and less at stake. Good thing is creativity.
-
This seems like an argument that communication differs online & in person but not to address the central freedom thing.
-
1) But if behavior is what needs attention and we need to preserve freedom of expression and online expression is uniquely bound
-
Actions, yes. Are you harming anyone or are you just talking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Harassing or assaulting non-binary person? 