Understanding humans cherry-pick & use motivated reasoning is better than assuming they all support the worst aspects of their worst ideas
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't see why it is 'better' to allow people to squirm away from the unpleasant side effects of their choices
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Amrael_pr
I don't think we need to do that to accept that they may not be motivated by those.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@Amrael_pr It's important to listen to what people are concerned abt & motivated by. The key-factors in their decision-making. 1/21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@Amrael_pr Rather than always focusing on key-factors to ourselves & assuming they also see the problem but think its great or don't care.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No problem listening to concerns. If way out involves supporting a belief system that includes my endless torment in hell, 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Amrael_pr @HPluckrose
then I DO have some reasons to be concerned about letting them have a say about my life
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Amrael_pr
.
@Amrael_pr Well, yes, preventing religion from impacting ppl's lives is essential. But they might not all be supporting eternal torture.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
.
@Amrael_pr I said this about it recently in a blog.pic.twitter.com/GXdQ6jKrem
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
so you hope to change minds without actually challenging the basics? How? (honest question).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If belief in Hell & justification is a basis of someone's belief, challenge it. More often, they try not to think abt that bit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.