4. Better, apparently, for women to date men they do not want to date as part of a 3-D chess game to win over Trump supporters
-
-
I think it was more the vilification of Trump voters & tendency of liberals (my side) to insistence on complete agreement.
-
To be clear, I don't find the article absurd like he did. I consider T voters absurd, but I think the NYT piece is accurate.
-
Insofar as how it describes a real phenomenon.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
"Stop being mean about our stupid and spiteful decision, or we'll be even MORE spiteful."
-
Basic psychology. Vilifying ppl for a decision makes it harder for them to admit or even recognise it was bad one.
-
I agree that villifying does, but mockery should still have a place, I think.
-
How will that help? I mean, its fun, but will it help them turn away from Trump?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, it was, simply for another reason. He's the one that assumed it was for sexual assault.
-
Sorry, I don't understand. The argument is that liberals are helping Trump by alienating the ppl they shld be trying to win back.
-
I understand and agree with the thrust of the piece even while believing that it further proved Trump supporters are children.
-
I think you and were simply disagreeing on a small point of the Jedd's Tweets, and not the hypothesis of the piece.
-
I'm suggesting women don't necessarily get the message that trump supporters support his attitude to women. That is all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.