-
-
how do you know you disagree if you haven't read or heard him?
-
Because, I have, obviously.
-
good
-
I used to quite like him. Think him a harmless & amusing provocateur.
-
so what changed your mind. The lefts reaction to him is making him rich
-
I know. Much better to ignore him. Ppl taking him seriously, emboldening alt-right, means serious ppl have to.
-
that should be the logical response
-
People like feeding their outrage.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(2/2) then you need somebody kicking the right-hand edge of the frame fairly hard.
-
Surely you need ethical, reasonable righties more than provocateurs who give the far-left ammo & justification?
-
(2/2) Love it or loathe it, we live in an attention economy, which Milo is good at playing.
-
Yes, but the point is he makes the right look very bad & this is used to justify the extreme left.
-
(2/2) following the rigth range of people on Twitter.
-
Well, that's a little odd. I am not of his tribe & he's only ever retweeted anything of mine once.
-
Not him directly. Somebody I followed 'cos of somebody else I followed, 'cos of Milo (amongst others) linked to it.
-
Yes, these connections exist.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Milo is a sort of litmus test. Those who cannot civilly disagree probably can't shift any conversation of substance either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The reasonable voices on the right are also called nazis . E.g. Romney MCCain
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He amuses/annoys me but I think he's 'neccessary'. If you want the Overton Window widening & pushing back into the middle (1/2)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.