I think the best way is to stress the difference in intention. Pomos want to argue that knowledge is an illusion. Subjective
-
-
Remember in Norwegian Gender Paradox, social scientist asked *why* ppl wanted to see if gender diffs existed.
-
After being presented with evidence they did. She said 'have to ask why they do this' & considered case closed.
-
And I am regarded w/ suspicion for gathering lots of info with which to criticise SocJus - have a bigoted agenda
-
I know you're a charitable person & I hope I am too but even we can be led into suspicion by our own biases.
-
Which you accounted for with (including ourselves) I'm so bored. Not being online is boring. I can't do it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.