Yeah, I just tweeted a thread out in explanation.
-
-
Biologist friend pointed me to responses to it showing where the problems were. I wouldn't know how to assess it.
-
Familiar problem. How to judge these disputes when you're an outsider to the field. It's not easy!
-
just gotta distrust ppl who have an agenda & are amassing evidence in support of it (which can include oneself)
-
I'm always wary of trying to judge veracity of info by evaluating motivation for gathering info tho.
-
Remember in Norwegian Gender Paradox, social scientist asked *why* ppl wanted to see if gender diffs existed.
-
After being presented with evidence they did. She said 'have to ask why they do this' & considered case closed.
-
And I am regarded w/ suspicion for gathering lots of info with which to criticise SocJus - have a bigoted agenda
-
I know you're a charitable person & I hope I am too but even we can be led into suspicion by our own biases.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.