No, that's what the first amendment means. Freedom of speech is the freedom to say what you think
-
-
Replying to @GSpellchecker @metroadlib
Holy shit. You really just... Holy shit. You're so wrong.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @OrgaP
It's funny when people say that they refrain from explaining why. Haha
@metroadlib2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @GSpellchecker @metroadlib
Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @OrgaP
Who said it was? Seems you're struggling. That's also a consequence
@metroadlib2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GSpellchecker @metroadlib
Ah. So you're just arguing to argue. Fair enough, we've all got time to burn occasionally.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OrgaP @GSpellchecker
I really look forward to your explanation why free speech doesnt actually mean freedom to say what you think.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @deqq_my_owl @GSpellchecker
Freedom of speech DOES mean freedom to say what you think. But US law was being discussed, not human theory.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It wasn't tho. She admitted law not relevant to speaking engagements.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @OrgaP and
btw. The law IS relevant to speaking engagements and the topic she was discussing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
No, its about what the 'government' can restrict. That's what she said.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.