I really think this is a conceptual or semantic difference. To see FS & 1st amendment as synonymous & other speaking freedoms separately.https://twitter.com/electomagneticJ/status/828696412867080194 …
-
-
This confusion can be resolved by saying 'I'm talking abt FS as the general principle of being able to freely express all kinds of ideas'
-
Then it will be clear why we're talking abt it in relation to a general positive attitude towards diversity of ideas in places for ideas.
-
But also understand Americans might call that 'a positive attitude towards diversity of ideas' rather than free speech.
-
More charitable than Brits accusing Americans of claiming to have invented FS or Americans accusing Brits of being hopelessly confused.
-
This is my observation of the cause of completely unnecessary confusion going on here anyway.
-
Short version: Americans are not being arrogant & Brits are not being imprecise. Literally talking about different things appropriately.
-
Obviously, this confusion doesn't always happen & lots of conversations on same page of general principle but it does happen a lot.
-
OK, yes, some Americans do think they invented freedom of speech & some Brits do pontificate on 1st amendment w/out having slightest clue.
-
But mostly there's just a misunderstanding which is easy to fix & it wld be great to do that rather than these endless circles of confusion.
-
Given that it'd be quite nice to try to talk about how to save liberal, secular democracy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
OK but lets be charitable in each situation and assume miscommunication, not arrogance.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Oh, sorry, thought you were responding to me saying that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.