I can find any other way to interpret that legal code. "Any class of Alien"
-
-
Replying to @Zacnaloen @AndyMeanie
I don't know. I've been going on what people who understand the constitution have been writing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If this overrules the other stuff about not discriminating by religion, obv it wld be constitutional.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, with accusations discrimination?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cek0001 @HPluckrose and
So the US can restrict travel, as a way to reduce security risks, without accusations of discrimination?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why can they? What do you mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Steps may reduce a security threats. Not unknown to restrict travel for health, fraud or security risks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You don't say. Talking abt what is & isn't constitutional.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Exec Orders are vetted by legal, Homeland Sec & State Dept. Have to assume it passed constitutional test
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cek0001 @HPluckrose and
A court has queried legal breach & agreed a stay on deportations & people travelling before law changed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I like cookies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.